Death Oct 30th
Cal Thomas’ column today is titled, “California: State of
death.” His opening sentence refers to the state’s new assisted suicide law so,
naturally, I assumed that assisted suicide was the focus of his angst. It
wasn’t. As it happens, assisted suicide is already legal in a number of states
and is being considered in many others. Mr. Thomas, as usual, is on a rant
about abortion, better known among his peers as baby killing.
The focus of his
column is a law in California that requires “pregnancy crisis centers to offer
information about affordable contraception, abortion and pre-natal care.” What
an outrage! What will these liberals think of next? Thomas seems uninterested,
or at least he completely ignores, the part about the clinics’ requirement to
offer information about affordable contraception. This is typical and it is logically
absurd. It should be obvious, and I am sure it is, that the use of contraceptives
reduces unwanted pregnancies and hence reduces abortions. Every adolescent knows
that and those who are forgetful pay dearly. So the rationale for not using
contraceptives is exactly what?
Thomas goes on to tell us that this law “is deceptively
labeled the reproductive FACT Act. The law requires women seeking help with an
unplanned pregnancy to be informed of alternatives, including abortions, which
the pregnancy crisis centers do not perform.” And this is deceptive because?
The L.A. Times claims “the law will counter the deceptive practices of some…crisis
centers to deter women from considering abortion. The real ‘deceivers’ (according
to Thomas) are the ones who promote abortion as a woman’s right.” Apparently
Thomas believes abortion is not a woman’s right, never mind the decision of
SCOTUS; Mr. Thomas is quite prepared to decide these things for himself. Now
there is more arrogance in this comment than even those on the right are
accustomed to showing.
Thomas then goes on to describe individual cases where women
regret having had abortions or claim to have been pressured to have abortions.
There is no doubt that this happens. I lived in a small town where the
physician who provide abortions was well known. His office was just off the main
street and I walked by it every morning on my way to work. There were always placard
carrying activists, both male and female, imploring the women entering the
office not to have an abortion. In point of fact the great majority of this man’s
patients were there for routine medical procedures, not abortions. No matter;
they were screamed at as baby killers anyway. Then there are the activists who
simply murder physicians who provide abortions and then claim that they are “doing
the Lord’s work.”
Once again Thomas seems only concerned with the unborn child;
once he/she is “post-born” its welfare is of no concern to these “pro-life” enthusiasts.
No comments:
Post a Comment