Wednesday, November 30, 2016


2016 Nov 30th

A year and a day ago I did this piece about Senator Ted Cruz. At the time I thought that his many faults completely disqualified him for the presidency. And now I am sure that by comparison to what we have wrought he would be splendid.

Dec 1st 2015
Today we’ll take a brief look at Senator Ted Cruz. Cruz is not loved by the senior members of his own party. He is, after all, the junior senator from Texas and as such he is by custom supposed to keep his head down and speak rarely. He hasn’t kept his head down and he certainly hasn’t kept his mouth shut, even going so far as to calling the leader of his own party, Senator McConnell, a liar and doing it on the Senate floor. Indeed he had very unkind things to say about all the Republican Senators in a subsequent, and unusual, Sunday session. This man aspires to the Presidency, he is doing quite well in the polls, but if he can’t even make nice with members of his own party how can he govern if he is elected?
The Senator has so far been very careful not to get lodged crosswise with Mr. Trump. He has managed to mimic some of Trump’s more outrageous positions. He hasn’t locked in on Trump’s insistence on deporting eleven million undocumented immigrants but he has condemned Senator Rubio who some years back suggested an amnesty method that would allow them to get green cards and stay where they are.
His most recent and rather curious comment is to accuse the Democrats of focusing on what he calls the condom police. Now it is obvious to anyone that there is a certain segment of society that opposes any form of birth control. The Catholic Churches’ position on the issue is well known. It is also well known that not all Catholics accept the Church’s position. Cruz, a Catholic, is quite forthright in suggesting that he has no problems with condoms. He says that he has two daughters and that he has no wish to have seventeen children.
(Cruz is not only unwilling to abide by Catholic teaching about birth control, he has gone so far as suggesting that the Pope should “be fired.” He is very unhappy about the Pope’s comments on climate change. He says, “I don’t know how that whole Papal thing works but if they can fire him they should.” He’s absolutely right; he has no idea about how that whole thing works.)
It is quite clear that many in the fundamentalist community have a problem with many methods of birth control.  They oppose any procedure that keeps a fertilized egg, which they believe is already a human being, from implanting in the uterus, This eliminates a number of birth control methods including the famous “morning after pill” as well as devices inserted in the uterus which prevent an embryo from implanting. The result is that while relatively few fundamentalists object to a birth control method which is no more than a barrier to the sperm reaching an egg there are many other birth control methods which they find objectionable.
Cruz has also come up with the notion, devoid of any supporting data, that most convicted felons are Democrats.  I believe that most people would find it odd if many convicted felons were registered to vote in any political party. Certainly once they are convicted of a felony their voting rights are often severely restricted; just how restricted depends on their state of residence. Cruz is an attorney and he should know that. He probably does but he is a candidate in search of an issue. He should keep looking.




Tuesday, November 29, 2016

2016 Nov 29th

The President–elect still seems to be having a problem distinguishing events in the real world from those present only in his imagination.  Some time ago he claimed that many thousands of Muslims in New Jersey had cheered and cheered when the twin towers fell on 9/11. Since no one else saw any such thing, and since the President-elect still claims that this is true, we must assume that his nervous system responsible for reflecting reality has gone haywire.

There has recently been a move to recount ballots in several critical states, states that Trump won by relatively narrow margins. He is enraged by the effrontery of this suggestion. He claims that the process will accomplish nothing. He is correct in believing that it will not overturn the election results; it will, however, more firmly establish the legitimacy of his win. That would seem desirable but questioning his win at all overcomes that advantage. His thin skin is not thickened by the election results.

He has also been tweeting again. He has recently gathered the heads of various news organizations to remonstrate with them about their coverage of his election campaign. As evidence of their bias, he points to a picture of himself in which he appears to have a double chin. Many other failures to treat him “fairly” are documented as well. His herding of reporters into a confined area, calling them “scum” and inciting his listeners to violence against them so that they needed a police escort to leave his rally is not mentioned
Trump lost the popular vote to Hillary Clinton by over two million votes; he finds this intolerable.  So Trump claims that millions of votes were fraudulently cast. Therefore, you see, he didn’t really lose the popular vote at all. He, of course, offers no evidence for his claim except the obvious one: he lost the popular vote and so there must have been cheating. He blames the news services for not proving that there was no cheating, so if you can’t prove that there was no cheating therefore there must have been cheating. Logic courses were apparently not part of the curriculum at Wharton when Trump was there.

Then there is Steven Bannon who is challenging Trump for the “Distorting Reality” top prize. Bannon recently commented on a piece by Kimberley Strassel in “The Daily Beast.” The article cited claimed Bannon said that he “was a Leninist who wanted to destroy the state.” Bannon responded by saying the story was “by a guy I never met in my life. This story is taken as gospel with nobody checking on it.” Unfortunately for Bannon the writer, Ronald Radosh of the Hudson Institute, sent a letter to the editor of “The Wall Street Journal” describing exactly the time and place of his encounter with Bannon confirming everything he had said.
Here is a Breitbart quote on the Confederate Flag just two weeks after Governor Nikki Hayley had that flag removed from the statehouse grounds. “Hoist it high and proud: The Confederate flag proclaims a glorious heritage.” This was the flag prominently displayed by the gunman who murdered nine people of color as they prayed in a Charleston church.
Livy, a Roman historian said that people in government tend to attract other people to government much like themselves. How right he was.




Monday, November 28, 2016

2016 Nov 28th

Those of you who are football fans have surely noticed last Saturday’s terrible, awful, loss by the University of Michigan football team to THE Ohio State football team. This loss upset a lot of people. Naturally, many Michigan fans blamed the officiating. One fan in particular was very upset by the officiating and that was the University of Michigan’s coach Jim Harbaugh.
Coach Harbaugh (Note that “Coach” has now become an honorific, a title.) was very upset by an offside call by officials late in the third quarter when Michigan led by a score of 17 to 7. Ohio State had the ball and was on Michigan’s 13-yard line when a Michigan player jumped the gun and a five-yard penalty was called. This moved the ball to Michigan’s 8-yard line.
This call so infuriated Coach Harbaugh that he exploded in rage. (Later imaging showed the call was correct.) He tore off his headphones and threw them on the ground breaking them. He screamed at the officials and we had the spectacle of this man, paid seven million dollars a year, by an order of magnitude paid more than any other state official (Except for other coaches of course.) acting like a seven-year-old throwing a temper tantrum.( Of course Coach Harbaugh remained vertical.)
The result of Harbaugh’s tantrum was an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty called on the Michigan Bench. This penalty moved the ball from the Michigan 8-yard line to the 4-yard line and two plays later Ohio State scored, making the score 17 to 14. Ohio State ultimately won the game in double overtime.

Michigan football teams have an interesting history of “sportsmanship” under their seven million dollar man. Consider the teams Harbaugh’s players have competed against: They began their season hosting The University of Hawaii football team. The score was 56 to nothing at the end of the third quarter and finished with a 63 to 3 win for Michigan. Then we have the contest against Maryland where Michigan won 58 to 3. Then they played Rutgers and managed a 78 to nothing win. This time they were ahead 57 nothing at the end of the third quarter and still ran up another 21 points in the fourth quarter; no sense taking a chance on a Rutgers comeback.  Harbaugh wants not just to win games but also to humiliate his opponents.


The Michigan trustees wanted a coach that could win football games and regain the university’s glorious football reputation. At least they got the first part of what they wanted.

Sunday, November 27, 2016

2016 Nov 27th

Castro is dead and Miami is rejoicing. Havana is another story; the older citizens who remember the crimes of Fulgensio Batista are weeping. Castro was certainly a brutal dictator but he didn’t start out that way. He and his entourage visited New York to address the UN in 1960 and brought their chickens with them.  In 1959 Castro addressed the Council on Foreign Affairs. Raoul Castro was with him and signed my wife’s ice skates. She was 14.
Castro tolerated no dissent, but most dictators tolerate no dissent. The previous Cuban dictator Fulgensio Batista began as a benign president supporting democratic ideals, later after a few years out of power, he pre-empted the scheduled election, got the support of wealthy landowners and ruled absolutely. He claimed those who opposed him were communists. That was enough for the US government to provide him with military, financial and logistical support.
Batista made Cuba a criminal’s paradise. Everyone from Meyer Lansky to very minor hoods loved the place. Gambling thrived, there were an estimated 15 thousand prostitutes roaming the streets of Havana. Batista and his relatives took payoffs from all operations.
Here is a quote from President John F. Kennedy, “At the beginning of 1959 United States companies owned about 40 percent of the Cuban sugar lands—almost all the cattle ranches—90 percent of the mines and mineral concessions—80 percent of the utilities—practically all the oil industry—and supplied two-thirds of Cuba's imports.”
Batista left Cuba in 1959 just ahead of Castro. He went to Rafael Trujillo’s Dominican Republic, another brutal dictator, but an anti-communist and so naturally supported by this country. From there Batista immigrated to Spain where he died in 1973 just ahead of a Cuban assassination squad sent to kill him.

Does the government of the United States have any responsibility for the rise of Castro? Should we be surprised at Castro’s continuing hostility toward the United States? Why should we be happy to encouraged the hostility of a government just 90 miles off our coast.?
Now we have a new problem: anyone who wants to can emigrate from Cuba to the United States. Any Cuban can get a green card, and the tap into our generous social programs. Last year there was a six-fold jump in Cubans arriving here.
The National Review, hardly a liberal rag, wants something done to stop this handout.  Marco Rubio is in agreement and even he is sponsoring legislation to stop the free rides.
Things do get complicated!



Saturday, November 26, 2016

2016 Nov 26th

There being nothing of any consequence on the Trump front today I offer this bit from “A Double Dozen and Six.”


Grocery Shopping


My wife and I used to shop for groceries together. I have always tried to be helpful with the household chores. I took the hamper of dirty laundry downstairs to the laundry room once a week so that my wife could do the washing. I opened the bedroom windows in the evening after the day had cooled off. I made a delicious crock-pot turkey soup. This required me to put two skinned turkey thighs into a crock-pot of canned chicken broth and carefully turn the crock-pot on high. As you can see, I am ever-so-helpful around the house.
I assumed that grocery shopping with my wife would be helpful to her also, and would have the added benefit of giving me an opportunity to put some goodies in the basket that my frugal wife would not ordinarily buy; tinned, smoked oysters for example, and smoked anchovies that my wife never touches. She refers to them disparagingly as “hairy dead fish.” I knew better than to ask her to get some for me so I thought to put some in the cart while helping her shop. That seemed a fair trade. It wasn’t a fair trade at all.
In the beginning (This is starting to sound like a Bible story.), I just pushed the cart wherever she wanted to go. That got old very quickly. I am impatient; pushing a cart around behind my wife while she toured the self-same aisle as many as three times…well, you can see the problem.
The next time we shopped together, she gave me my very own list and I got my very own shopping cart. I was told to put nothing in the cart that wasn’t on the list. Of course I didn’t get where I am today by following orders. I snuck a small jar of pickled pigs’ feet under the large size taco shells. But a problem arose when I had filled my order list. I had found everything on my list, and now I had to find my wife. I had seen her earlier, just in passing, but now she seemed to have disappeared. I went down the main aisle and looked down each of the wide cross isles. She was not to be found. I went to the main aisle on the other side and repeated the process. No luck. I went to the produce section, and then the meat counter, and still no wife. What to do?
I did what any intelligent husband would do under those circumstances. I got a cup of extravagantly expensive coffee and sat on a bench watching for her. OK, if she wants to play hide-and-seek, let her seek me for a while. Finally, it occurred to me that I had been sitting for about fifteen minutes and I wasn’t being sought. I then marched directly to the service counter. “I have lost my little daughter Susan.” I said to the worker there. Could you page her for me? She would be happy to do that. Now, blaring out over the loudspeakers came, “Would little Suzy Jones please come to the service desk. Your father has been trying to find you.” The last phrase was in a mildly accusative tone. Did it work? Oh, did it ever work! Within about  two and a half minutes, a very red-faced woman who claimed to be my wife joined me. She was in a high dudgeon. (Has anyone ever seen someone in a low dudgeon?)
I explained that I had searched everywhere for her, that I had even sat patiently drinking coffee waiting for her to walk by, and that I was becoming very concerned for her welfare. That last was ridiculous. Susan weighs just under one hundred and twenty pounds, but she can give a hard look that could send a pro tackle back on his heels. She bought it though. A man can get away with enormous offenses if he claims he has committed them only because he has his dear wife’s welfare in mind. That one fact has gotten me out of more scrapes…but that’s another story.
Now comes time for the examination of the contents of my cart. Did I get what was on my list? I certainly did. How hard could it have been? A dozen eggs were on my list and a dozen eggs were in my cart. But these were the extra-large eggs, not the large eggs that she claimed were a better buy. Five pounds of flour was on the list, but this was bread flour, not all-purpose flour. How was I supposed to know that she wanted all-purpose flour? How many different kinds of flour can there be? She rattled them off. We headed back to the flour section  and got the right kind. Ground turkey was on the list, but it was not “extra-lean” ground turkey. More returns. A pound of sugar was wanted, but not the “super fine” sugar I got. I quite naturally thought that “super fine” represented a better quality sugar than plain, simple, sugar. It does not. Fully half the stuff in my cart must go back to the shelf from whence it came. This was humiliating. I protested that she should have been more specific about what she wanted. She became specific about what she thought of men so poorly informed about the demands of cooking that they thought all flour was alike. I knew better than to belabor the point.
I went through the checkout first. While she picked up a magazine to pass the time I slipped the pickled pigs’ feet out of the cart and on to the endless belt just in front of the vertically canted tray of ground turkey. She won’t see them. I swiped my credit card and put the itemized slip in my pocket. I waited for her and we left together. The bags went into the car trunk. As I started the car she said, “I believe it would be better next time if you just helped me unload the car when I get home. Oh yes, I saw your pigs’ feet. I got a small tenderloin steak. I’ll let you fix the pigs’ feet any way you like for supper tonight. I’ll do the steak for myself.”
            We have an unspoken agreement now that leaves the shopping to her. I have not objected.





Friday, November 25, 2016

2016 Nov 25th

Cal Thomas holds forth this morning with a column headed “A Tale of ‘Hamilton,’ Trump and liberal diversity.” Thomas tells us that Trump wants the actor Brandon Victor Dixon to apologize for the tacky (Thomas’ term) lecturing of the Vice President on diversity and the “fear” of people like himself of a Trump-Pence administration. Pence, on the other hand apparently had no problem with the actor’s remarks and said so.
Then Thomas comments that as he watched the comings and goings from Trump Tower and the New Jersey golf resort he saw only one woman not connected to a man who was being considered, and that was Michelle Rhee the controversial Democratic former head of the Washington D.C. schools system. If Ms. Rhee was ever being seriously considered for Secretary of Education (And if she wasn’t why was Trump interviewing her?) that consideration ended abruptly when she took herself out of the running. The job subsequently went to Betsy DeVos a much richer, and very much whiter female candidate.
Thomas spends the rest of his column, about 80 percent of it flogging a woman, K. T. McFarland for Secretary of Defense. WOW, who is this woman and why should we hope that she is put in charge of our defense apparatus just behind the POTUS?
We are told that “She held positions in the Nixon, Ford and Reagan administrations (None of these positions are specified) and now she is a commentator on Fox News. McFarland told Thomas that she was an early and vocal Trump supporter and that she briefed Trump before the debates. She has a B.A. from Georgetown, an M.A from Oxford and she darn near got a Ph.D. from MIT, winding up with an ABD. (All but the dissertation) Hey what more could anyone want in the person heading up the armed forces?
She came close; Just today Trump Transition announced that K.T. McFarland would be the new Deputy National Security Advisor, Deputy to General Michael Flynn. That’s nowhere near being Secretary of Defense but maybe the country will be even safer with her in this slot.

Thomas Sowell also has a column today. He, as usual, has unpleasant thigs to say about liberals. He begins by pointing out that “One maddening aspect of their thinking, or non-thinking, is their failure to understand that there is nothing you can do about the past.” That is nonsense; of course, you can’t change the past but you can compensate for past abuses. That’s what the legal system is all about. Strike a pedestrian while you are driving drunk and try to tell the judge that the accident is in the past and nothing can be done about it. The notion is pathetic. Sowell’s cumbersome thought processes hope to make a different point, that is that by the time a student is ready for college the admissions committee should not look at the applicant’s childhood but only at his/her present condition. He claims, “There are people who urge college admissions committees to let disadvantaged students be admitted with lower test scores or other academic indicators.” If Sowell had ever sat on a college admissions committee he would quickly discover that the student’s history before he/she takes any entrance examinations is of critical importance.
The Spanish Consul’s daughter is applying for admission. She has had just three years of English in her high school but she is quite fluent in Italian and French. Too bad her SAT verbal scores are in the low 400s. If her background is not considered by the admissions committee the college will soon have a new director of admissions.
Thomas Sowell, once again, doesn’t know what he is talking about.


Thursday, November 24, 2016

2016 Nov 24th

In the Saturday-Sunday edition of “The Wall Street Journal” there, on the Opinion  page is an article titled “Steve Bannon on Politics as War.” The article is, in fact, primarily about Steven K. Bannon’s attempt to rehabilitate Steven K. Bannon.
To rehabilitate himself he must begin by attacking the media that presented these awful untruths about him. “He blames these attacks on a lazy media noting for instance that the renegade Jew line wasn’t Breitbarts. Conservative activist David Horowitz has taken credit for writing the line himself in a piece about Weekly Standard Editor Bill Kristol.” And of course we can believe every word of that. Bannon is frantically ducking any and all anti-Semitic accusations.
Bannon claims that Breitbart is “the most pro-Israel site in the United States of America.” He then spends some time naming the Jewish writers he employs “These claims of anti-Semitism aren’t serious. It’s a joke” But then there was the testimony of his ex-wife who claimed that he didn’t want his children going to school with “a bunch of Jews.” Bannon claims he never said that but it is a curious thing for a wife to make up out of whole cloth. All you have to do to get a flavor of Bannon’s world view is to go to the Breitbart website.

Then we should be curious about the neo-Nazi and other white nationalist groups’ fervent support of Bannon, Breitbart and Trump. The talking point for the “BBT” people is that they can’t help who supports them. Of course they can, if they don’t want the support of these people then they shouldn’t come out with programs and ideas the neo-Nazis find attractive.

Recently Trump has said that he would not support the prosecution of Hillary Clinton.  This immediately got under the skin of the Breitbart people and the information was published under the headline “Broken Promise.” Bad form boys! Never attack the King. That item, with its headline, quickly vanished from the Breitbart website.

Giving Bannon an entire page with which to white wash himself is very good of the WSJ; unfortunately both Bannon and Trump have far too much baggage for their denials to be effective.


Wednesday, November 23, 2016

2016 Nov 23rd

Betsy DeVos is now Trump’s pick for Secretary of Education. It figures; Trump has never been elected to anything before and Betsy DeVos has never spent a day in a classroom teaching anything. Even so, she knows the answer to America’s education problems: privatize, privatize, privatize! This is the Republican solution to all our problems. (Yes, even the military was privatized by Betsy DeVos’ brother, Eric Prince, in the infamous “Blackwater” scandal, where private security guards started killing people unnecessarily in Iraq.)
Eric, Betsy and the whole DeVos clan are very rich and they are devoted to the associated Republican principles. Their money came from the Amway Company. Some had called the ideas presented by Amway a pyramid scheme because the individual entrepreneur could recruit others who could recruit still others, and so on getting a portion of the profits from each person in the chain. Perfectly legal and it kept lots of middle class housewives out of the local bars…and it made the DeVos family a ton of money.

The DeVos folks are staunch Republicans and so were not jumping up and down with delight when Trump won the nomination. Their education has been, for the most part, in religiously themed colleges. Betsy DeVos has never attended a public school of any kind. I would guess that they were not amused by Trump’s tape of him bragging about what he could do with women because he was rich and famous. Well, that was then, now when offered a cabinet appointment Betsy DeVos is right there willing to sacrifice most anything to serve her country and be called Madame Secretary.

She might have a rude awakening. Much educational policy is determined by the states themselves and  Republicans they are very resistant to intrusion into their state’s educational system by the heavy hand of the federal government. DeVos attempting to throw her billions around in this theater might get her some “butt out” advice. In any event, she will be much more limited in what she can do in a government employee, even a cabinet member, than as a super-rich civilian. She will find out.


Then there is her rejection of gay marriage. Trump in an interview with Lesley Stahl says that the SCOTUS has spoken and gay marriage is the law of the land. So what will DeVos have to say about school bathrooms  sorted by birth certificate gender?  Are we having fun yet?

Tuesday, November 22, 2016

2016 Nov 22nd

A head cold has caught me by surprise; it isn’t likely fatal; it is annoying. Here is another true story from “A Double Dozen and Six.”

                                                              Warm Enough
Steelhead fishing in March at the mouth of Michigan’s Platte River is a cold business. The winds come off Platte Bay from the west with nothing but low sand dunes to break their force before they are in your face. If that weren’t enough, ice in table-top chunks float past your insulated waders to remind you that March is not a civilized time to fish this river.
I am here with Jonas. He is in his mid-seventies, small, bright eyed, pleasant and talkative, usually with a bulge of Redman in his cheek. He retired some years ago from the maintenance crew of the college where I teach. While he was there we talked about steelhead fishing every time we saw each other and we talked about how we would have to try it together sometime. If we were ever going to do that it would have to be soon. We took my camper and headed north.
Steelheading on this river is best done at first light, even then it is crowded enough so that a prudent man arrives an hour earlier. We were prudent. It was dark when we pulled into the parking lot at the river mouth. I struggled into polypropylene long-johns and the insulated waders and finally multiple layers of the new micro-fibers that went under the Gore-Tex parka.
Jonas was well protected too, but with equipment more befitting a retiree than an employed single faculty member whose only real expense was steelheading. Jonas had slipped his wiry frame into heavy wool long-johns, then thick woolen socks, and finally stocking-foot waders. Wading shoes were an over-priced, unnecessary, luxury by his standards, so he wore huge white cotton socks over the wader feet and tucked these into out-sized black tennis shoes. Perfectly serviceable. Two thick, hand-knit, wool sweaters came next. To provide a little extra protection against snagging the waders, and against the wind, he pulled a pair of heavy coveralls over the whole works.  His fishing vest topped the coveralls.  Next came a fresh mouthful of Redman.  A billed cap with the ear-flaps pulled down and he was ready.
We walked toward the river. I stepped out on the shelf ice and then into the knee-deep water and began throwing my spawn bag upstream and letting it drift down, bumping along the bottom.  Jonas stood on the ice about ten feet upstream and to my left.  Most of the other fishermen who had gathered by then were standing in the river.  Jonas was the only one on the bank, and, of course, that seemed quite reasonable as, looking at him, there was not a sign he was wearing waders.  He was just an old man in coveralls and tennis shoes, clearly out-classed by the equipment and skills of everyone else, particularly the well-dressed fellow on his left.  I had seen the man emerge from an expensive car with out-of-state plates.  He had everything, even neoprene gloves.  His noodle rod was custom-made and he had a brass multiplier reel that probably cost more than the rod.  Jonas is an outgoing, friendly guy, but his attempts at light conversation with the pro on his left began by getting monosyllabic responses and went downhill from there. I hoped the bastard would get hung up on the bottom.
Just then Jonas had a hit.  “Fish on.”  Everyone was watching him now.  His rod tip went up.  The fish ripped line and broke water about fifty feet down river.  It was a nice fish but not spectacular.  Jonas moved downstream along the shelf ice, keeping his rod tip up and the line over the heads of the other fishermen.  I followed behind him with the net.  It was impossible to beach the fish.  There wasn’t any beach.  It didn’t take long in water this cold and the steelie was ready to net, but of course Jonas would do it himself.  He stepped carefully into the thigh-deep water and expertly slipped the net under an exhausted six-pound male.  Then he was back up on the shelf ice, fish in one hand, rod in the other, coveralls wet from the thighs down, sneakers squishing water onto the ice, and a broad grin on his face.
After the fish was safely tied up he resumed his spot.  The well-equipped fisherman to his left stared at him slack-jawed and stopped casting.  I thought he had never seen anyone net his own fish before.  That wasn’t it at all.
He turned to Jonas, “Aren’t you cold?”
“Naw,” said Jonas proudly.  And then, patting the chest of his coveralls, “Hell, I got two wool sweaters under here.”
The man didn’t say a thing, just slowly shook his head.  I’d love to hear the story he tells at some exclusive club about the old character he came across in Michigan who waded the Platte in March in coveralls and tennis shoes.


Monday, November 21, 2016

2016 Nov 21st

Emily Stewart has an interesting piece in “The Street.” She describes the conflicts of interest Trump has in just one of his properties, his newly acquired Old Post Office building 60 year lease obtained from the U.S. General Services administration, the head of which he will now be in charge of appointing. He will want major tax credits for developing the building, which will come from the IRS and Treasury, the heads of which he will also appoint. He borrowed 170 million dollars from Deutsche Bank, which faces a 14 billion dollar suit from mortgage investigations by the Justice Department whose head he will also appoint.

Paul Ryan of Common Cause says, “We have landlord–tenant. We have taxpayer-tax collector. We have prosecutor–friend of the prosecuted. These are all of the conflicts that arise in just one relatively minor holding of President-elect Trump through the Trump Organization. We are looking at the potential of the greatest conflicts of interest of any White House of any president in this nation’s history.” The Trump Organization controls more than 500 organizations worldwide. Divestiture of these by Trump is a joke.

Ivanka, Trump’s daughter, appeared Sunday on “60 Minutes.” She took the occasion of her newfound celebrity (Why would they have had her as a guest if she weren’t the President elect’s daughter?) to hawk a ten thousand dollar gold bracelet that her company has for sale. Maybe it’s genetic.
Ivanka sitting in on Trump’s meeting with Indian businessmen who are cooperating on some Trump property construction could be an attempt to push some of the Trump Organization’s business interests toward his kids. The same might be the case when Trump admits daughter Ivanka to his first meeting with Shinzo Abe, the Prime Minister of Japan although that was more like a “meet and great” with no other purpose.

Trump is performing exactly as everyone expected he would perform; his cabinet picks have the American Nazi Party ecstatic and the ACLU appalled. His pick of Kansas congressman Kris Kobach who is pushing for the registration of Muslims is just the beginning. Eventually he’ll want to register everyone who isn’t blonde and put Anne Coulter in charge of the program.


Sunday, November 20, 2016

2016 Nov 20th

True story from “A Double Dozen and Six” on the occasion of  my needing a break from politics.


Emergency

It is still pitch dark but I am suddenly fully awake.  My left shoulder and left chest feel stiff, a little like muscle strain, but not exactly.  I assume that I have been sleeping on my left side with my left arm in an awkward position.  I get up and turn on the light.  It is 2:30 AM  I sit on the bed and move my shoulder around. That does not help.  The discomfort is turning into pain and is localizing in my chest.  I think about indigestion and then I think about how often heart attacks are assumed to be indigestion, and I think about the importance of time.  Even so, I wait.  Finally, preferring embarrassment to death, I decide to call a hospital emergency room, describe my symptoms, and see what they suggest.  Give someone else the responsibility.
The voice in the ER is male and businesslike.  I tell it that I have awakened with chest pain, which by now is considerable worse.  No the pain is not radiating down my arm; no, I am not sweating; yes, I am having trouble breathing.  When the voice hears that I am 61 years old, it suggests that I come right in.  Smart voice!
I live alone and I do not much feel like driving.  The voice suggests that I call the local fire department and have them send their ambulance-rescue team.  That sounds somewhat extreme, but my choices are limited.  I call their dispatcher; give my symptoms and my address, and say that I will wait downstairs to save some time.  No dice; the dispatcher wants me to stay by the phone.
I wait.  The pain increases.  I wait a bit longer.  My phone rings.  It is the dispatcher checking the address.  The ambulance is having trouble finding my apartment building.  The buzzer rings at last, and I get up to press the button releasing the outside door, open the apartment door, then retreat to the couch.  By now, I feel awful generally, and the chest pain restricts my breathing.  Strangely, I am more curious than frightened.
An EMT and a driver come in.  A police officer hovers in the background.  They are friendly, almost casual, but they waste no time.  I get the same questions. Where is the pain?  Is my left arm involved?  Is it a shooting pain?  Was I sweating?  The answers haven’t changed.  Then pain is localized to the left of my sternum and feels like a vice.  Breathing is uncomfortable to say the least; my left arm is not involved.  I am not sweating.  No, I have no history of heart trouble; I jog for God’s sake.  (I had thus assumed myself immune from heart problems.)  I have had several exercise EKG’s.  No problems.  My relatives do not die of heart attacks.  I see myself as indestructible.  The Greeks are right; hubris has a price.
The team gets to work.  Out of a large case comes a blood pressure cuff.  My frighteningly high 190/100 is radioed to the hospital ER.  Oxygen tubes go around my neck, one terminating in each nostril.  Electrodes are attached to my chest and the results are sent to the hospital by telemetry.  A needle goes into a vein in my arm, and a plastic bag begins dripping something into by blood stream.  They tell me it is simply a precautionary measure should I need intravenous medication quickly.  I am given a nitroglycerine pill.  “Dissolve this under your tongue.  Don’t swallow it.”  They still think I am having a heart attack. If I am not, it is a great imitation.  Through all of these ministrations, the emergency people are cheerful, apparently clam, and certainly unhurried. They express no sense of desperate urgency, which might lead me to believe I am at death’s door.
This calm, deliberate behavior, I begin to see as overdone.  Impatient by nature and hurting considerably I want to get to the hospital.  A collapsible-wheeled stretcher appears. I am helped aboard, strapped down, and the journey downstairs to the ambulance begins.  The wheeled stretcher is jockeyed around the corner of my living room toward the apartment hall, and then down the stairs.  It is a very tight fit.  They keep me right side up and get me downstairs, but only with considerable effort.  I weigh 150 pounds.  Had I weighed 200 we might well have needed two more stretchers and a new EMT team.  They radio the hospital to expect us in five minutes.
The trip to the hospital is quick. No sirens. I am wheeled into the hospital ER and a casually dressed, cheerful male physician about 45 meets me there.  He tells me his name and I promptly forget it.  There are two nurses, both young, both attractive, one with a ponytail.  I am not too sick to notice things of importance.
I am hooked up to a larger, more impressive, heart monitor with many more leads.  A substantial blood sample is drawn, filling many vials.  The physician begins to take a quick history by asking the same questions I have heard twice before.  I give him the same answers.  A portable x-ray machine appears.  I am given morphine for the pain, but it helps very little.  They ask the whereabouts of my closest relatives.   My 27-year-old son, Henry, is in law school, and lives in a rooming house about three miles away; I mention him.  Suddenly, he is there, trying to stay out of the way and not look too worried.  We agree that we will not call his mother just yet.  We are divorced, but good friends.  She lives 50 miles away and can do nothing except worry.  She is a nurse; she does not handle this sort of worry very well.
I finally have time to notice my surroundings.  I am the only ER patient.  The room is large, white, and almost barren.  The physician tells me that with some effort they have persuaded the admitting office to give me a room in Coronary Intensive Care.  He insists that I am too sick to move elsewhere.  Fine, I prefer to stay right here.
I begin to feel light-headed which is strange considering that I am almost flat on my back.  I am obviously on the point of passing out, perhaps irretrievably.  I tell the doctor.  He is already doing something, moving quickly.  Atropine is administered through one of the tubes feeding into a vein, and I feel warm and very awake.  Sober faces are suddenly smiling.  A nurse said my heart rate dropped below 40.  An EKG device on the wall behind my head has a continuous pulse monitor.  I am very thirsty.  I am told that this is the result of the atropine.  The team decides that my little scare could have been caused partly by the heart’s response to pain.  They increase the morphine, asking me to tell them when the pain is all gone.  It takes several doses through the I.V. tubing, but eventually there is only a twinge when I breathe deeply.  I decide that I like these people.
In addition to watching the EKG, the physician and the nurses spend a good deal of time listening to my heart, their stethoscopes probing about for what I assume is a good location.  One says, “I can’t hear it at all now.”  If I weren’t feeling a good deal better, I’d have found that profoundly disturbing.  I looked at them quizzically, “Oh?”  The nurse smiles self-consciously, suddenly aware of the remark’s impact.  They explain that I have, possibly among other things, pericarditis.  This, I am told, is an inflammation of the pericardium, the sac that contains the heart.  When inflamed, this container swells, and the beating heart rubs against it.  The physician can hear this “rub” and  the patient feels it as chest pain.  In my case, the rub is loud enough to obscure the sound of the heartbeat.  All my attendants hear is “swish-swish, swish-swish;” no “flub-dub, flub-dub.”  They let me listen. 
While I have pericarditis, I may also be having a heart attack, a myocardial infarction.  In the early stages, the EKG patterns are similar.  Later, if there is heart damage, the EKG will change, as will certain blood enzyme components. At this point, it appears to be “just” pericarditis.
They decide I am stable enough to leave the emergency room and go up to Coronary Intensive Care.  They trundle me off on my wheeled table, IV’s, oxygen tubes, etc., accompanying me.  The ICU is impressive.  The new nurse is friendly and cheerful.  It is a double room, but I am the only person in it and with one RN per room, I get generous and expert attention.  They give me Indocin, an anti-inflammatory drug.  I say goodbye to Henry who has class in three hours.  He will be back at noon.  They fit me into a blood-pressure cuff that inflates automatically every few minutes and prints my blood pressure, systolic and diastolic, on a continuous tape.  I watch it perform.  An amazing gadget!  The EKG and pulse monitor are mounted on the wall just behind my bed, so I can see them when I turn my head.  Things are settling down.  I notice that my pulse hovers around 60 with blood pressure 110/70.  Great.  The young nurse is impressed.  Perhaps I will live after all.
I decide that I have been taking life much too seriously.  I had thought earlier this summer about buying a red Alfa Romeo convertible, but after some soul and wallet searching, had concluded that it was just not a sensible choice.  Now I promise myself that I will get it as soon as I recover enough to drive it.  That settled, I fall deeply asleep; morphine is well named.
 A nurse awakens me very early with my anti-inflammatory drug followed five minutes later by a lab tech that needs some more of my blood.  Blood enzymes are monitored periodically to determine the extent of heart damage.  Breakfast arrives.  I am starving.
I am anxious to get out of Intensive Care where only relatives may visit.  I speak to the nurse and I am told I will be moved soon.  The grim reaper has moved off a few steps.
By 3:00 PM, I am on my way to a stepdown unit.
Now I am allowed to walk around.  My EKG leads go to a small, portable, telemetry box that broadcasts my condition to a screen at the nurse’s station.  I can stroll about carrying my transmitter so long as I stay within range of receivers protruding every twenty feet or so from the corridor ceiling.  If I stray out of range of these receivers, my EKG at the nurses' station will show a straight line and there will be all manner of unpleasant consequences. 
That afternoon I am again visited by all my physician friends who again go into my medical history.  It seems I have only pericarditis, but they cannot find its cause.  I have no bacterial infection, nor any of a variety of other diseases that can precipitate pericarditis.  They assume the cause is viral, but they cannot tell which virus until well after I have recovered, if then.  To determine which virus I had, they will take new blood samples in about a month and compare the antibody level then with the present level.  Increased antibodies will indicate which family of viruses has attacked.  Since there isn’t much they can do about viral infection anyway, the matter seems academic. There is no evidence, either from the EKG or from the blood chemistry, of heart damage.  They tell me that I can probably go home the next day.
Later that afternoon I have a visitor, a friend about my age who smokes two packs of cigarettes a day, eats eggs whenever he wishes, which is frequently, and exercises several times a day by standing up.  He doesn’t say so, but after seeing his expression when he looks at me, I can tell he is thinking, “So much for health nuts.”  I carefully explain that this was not a heart attack, but pericarditis, and that a man my age (and his) in lesser physical condition probably wouldn’t have survived.  He smirks.
They discharge me at 2:00 PM the next afternoon.  I have been in the hospital barely 60 hours.  Someone pushes me in a wheelchair to my son’s antique Volkswagen.  Fifteen minutes later, I am climbing the stairs to my second floor apartment to retrieve my car keys so I can get some groceries.
*  *  *

            It is now several months later. The convalescent viral blood studies reveal nothing.  The cause of the attack remains unknown and, presumably, could recur anytime.  I am told that no precautions can be taken, just “stay healthy.”  Life is a crapshoot.  Even so, I have not bought the Alfa.  Promises made in extremis, even to yourself, are easily broken.

Saturday, November 19, 2016

2016 Nov 19th


Donald Trump has named retired Lt. General Michael Flynn as his national security advisor. He has also named Senator Jeff Sessions as his Attorney General and Mike Pompeo to be Director of the CIA.
We begin with Flynn, whose appointment to the Trump White House is not helpful if draining the swamp is a goal. Though Flynn is not a lobbyist himself, his company, Flynn Intel Group, is registered with Congress as a lobbying organization, and has a registered lobbyist on its staff. On election day, Flynn published an opinion piece for The Hill urging U.S. support for Turkey’s controversial strongman president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and pushing for the extradition of Erdogan’s political rival, Fethullah GĂĽlen, who now resides in Pennsylvania. “From Turkey’s point of view, Washington is harboring Turkey’s Osama bin Laden,” Flynn wrote.
There is also a photo of Flynn having a black tie celebratory dinner sitting right next to Vladimir Putin. They are celebrating the anniversary of RT, the Putin controlled Russian news service. What a great pick for a national security advisor…if you are Vladimir Putin. Incidentally, no senate confirmation for Flynn’s position is required. Trump gets whomever Trump wants!

Senator Jeff Sessions’ appointment as Attorney General does require Senate confirmation. This fine southern gentleman was turned down by the senate for a judgeship some thirty years ago because of his bigoted remarks. Many believe that it is unlikely that Sessions, if confirmed by the senate, would take any action to stop the resurgence of racial bigotry. There are right wing web sites that claim Sessions desegregated Alabama schools. Indeed he did prosecute the schools that refused to desegregate but the 1964 civil rights act passed by a Democratic president gave him the legal requirement to do that.
The senate might bang his confirmation around fora bit but the senate is a club whose members, when called upon, will support each other. Sessions will be confirmed.

The final pick for head of the CIA is Congressman Mike Pompeo from Kansas. He is one smart cookie, first in his class at West Point and a Harvard Law graduate. He has been very critical of Hillary Clinton but the CIA is supposed to concentrate its efforts outside the United States. That can include Benghazi but perhaps a presidential pardon for Hillary Clinton will permanently de-fang the like of this smarty-pants.


Friday, November 18, 2016




2016 Nov 18th

Watching football is much more meaningful if you have a lexicon to interpret the announcer’s comments; without such help the viewer will be irretrievably lost, so here follows some commonly used terms and their meaning:


Negative yardage: When yards are lost the runner is said to have gained negative yardage. This means that the running back really did run back. Running backs are supposed to run forward. No one knows why they are called running backs instead of running forwards.


Offensive player: Almost all football players are offensive, particularly after losing a game…or even after they win one if you catch them in the locker room before they shower.

 Skill player: This term is very irritating to the three-hundred-and-thirty pound linemen who are not considered skill players. Sometimes they then become offensive players.

Pass interference: Your team is not supposed to let a player on the other team catch a pass. The defender is supposed to interfere with the opposing player’s early progress down the field or try to knock the ball away at just the last minute; however, if he knocks his opponent to the ground or trips him, that is against the rules and is not allowed. Certain kinds of pass interference are just fine, other kinds are not; It all depends on which team gives the biggest tips to the referees.

Roughing the quarterback: Defenders are supposed to be rough on their opponent’s quarterback. The whole idea is to scare him so badly that that he never wants to throw the ball, or if he does throw it he will throw it to somebody on your team. However, a three hundred-and-thirty-pound lineman is not allowed to grab the quarterback’s face mask, nor is he allowed to knock the quarterback down after he has thrown the ball. If this happens a major penalty is incurred. The lineman must be sure the referee is not looking when he commits these offenses. If he can do this and avoid getting caught his value to the team and his salary go up substantially.

Roughing the kicker: If your team member runs into an opponent’s kicker after he punts the ball that is roughing the kicker and it is a major no-no. Sometimes a player just comes close to the kicker who then falls to the ground grabbing his knee and writhing in pain. This convinces the referee, who has been ogling the cheerleaders, that a roughing penalty should be called. The better punters, in addition to being former soccer players, were also undergraduate drama majors.

Two point conversion: This is not a religious experience although it’s close. Once a touchdown has been scored the scoring team can elect to take the ball on the other team’s two yard line; if they can get it over the goal in one play they get two points.

Tight end: This is a guy who can either block or run down the field to catch a pass. If he should catch the pass he usually gets hit by several opponents who hope that will make him drop the ball. Tight ends aren’t usually tight although a belt or two before the game greatly helps their outlook.

Excessive celebration: Once a touchdown has been scored it is unseemly for the ball carrier to dance about, do the shimmy and then do more than two backflips; if he does he can be penalized for excessive celebration. If the scoring player politely hands the ball to an official, raises one hand in the air and cries “yeah team,” that highly improbable behavior will not be penalized.

Eligible receiver: The eligibility of an eligible receiver has nothing whatever to do with his marital status; it has to do with being eligible, according to the rules, to catch the football.

Nose guard:  This is not a player whose job it is to guard noses. A nose guard is a defensive player who lines up opposite the offensive center. He is usually concerned only with guarding his own nose.

Pooch kick: Relax SPCA members; no one is kicking a dog. A pooch kick is a low flat trajectory kick that bounces along the ground and is difficult to field,

Run out the clock: This doesn’t mean that someone runs onto the field with a clock; it means that a team which is ahead makes only very safe and time consuming plays thus leaving little time left for their opponents to get the ball back and score.

Bootleg: A bootleg occurs when the quarterback pretends to hand the ball off to a running back but instead keeps it himself to deceive the defense. It has nothing to do with the repeal of prohibition.

Touchdown: If the ball crosses the plane of the goal line that is called a touchdown and counts for six points. Whether the ball carrier is touched or not, or touches someone else, is irrelevant. There was a time very long ago when the ball actually had to be touched to the ground between the goalposts.

And finally-- understand that backs are not scalable; a full back cannot be exchanged for four quarter backs…although many coaches hope that will change!



Thursday, November 17, 2016

2016 Nov 17th

One of my very favorite columnists, Cal Thomas, the former VP of the now defunct Moral Majority continues to hold forth with a newspaper column. The Record Eagle periodically inflicts his opinions on its readers. They did that again this morning. Thomas’ column has taken on the task of “Advising the President Elect.”
He begins by complaining about the many pundits who formerly opposed Trump and are now suggesting that he pull back on the promises that got him elected. …And what were those promises again? He said the no Muslims should be admitted to the country “until we find out what the hell is going on.” I guess he found out because he changed that to not admitting people from countries unstable because of Muslim activity. The point is that Trump changes his position whenever he feels like it; no reasons are given.
He has also said he would deport the children of aliens even though they were born here and are American citizens. Thomas is unhappy that the ACLU’s “army of lawyers  and volunteers will be employed to thwart Trumps agenda.” If deporting citizens because their parents are here illegally is part of Trump’s agenda then good for the ACLU.
There is also the business of killing the families of terrorists if that is required to kill the terrorists; he has no problem with it. He will water board captives and apparently has no problem with torture either…and I guess neither does Cal Thomas, this former Moral Majority member.

Thomas then gives Trump some advice about taxes. Trump‘s plan has already cut the top tax rates enough to save him a bundle and then he wants to eliminate the estate tax and that will save him several billions more. Trump’s latest plan would reduce federal revenues by $6.2 trillion over the next decade, with nearly half of the tax cuts going to the highest-income one percent of households.   
Never mind the national debt, Cal Thomas wants to enrich the rich even more; he wants a  “flat or fair tax” Now Thomas believes the same tax rate for the guy earning 40 thousand a year with three kids and the Donald Trump types pulling in a half billion a year is fair? That isn’t even worth a comment.

Thomas says that we should “start building the wall but announce that to help pay for it a toll system will be implemented charging people who cross our border in either direction. Drivers have to pay a toll to get into and out of Manhattan. Why not tolls for getting in and out of America?” Gee Cal, what happens if you fly? What a splendid way to produce a new level of bureaucracy.
Finally, Cal wants students to avoid “government schools.” When poor children are “liberated from government schools and their grades and outlook on life improves that evidence will be proof enough that school choice was a success.” The “government schools” Thomas is talking about here must be local schools; the only federal government schools I know about are on army posts. Thomas believes that the educational benefit of his private schools should be determined by student’s grades (determined by their teachers) and the kid’s “outlook on life.” Any objective evidence that junior has actually learned anything is irrelevant.



Wednesday, November 16, 2016

2016 Nov 16th

Now for a bit of whimsy: What about “Trump: The Musical!” That isn’t so far-fetched, although someone sitting nearby thinks it’s ridiculous…of course she’s right, but imagining the ridiculous often reduces the pressure of reality. Why else is farce so popular?
We need an impresario. Andrew Lloyd Weber is surely available. Although he is a conservative, this could be a significant additional achievement. Of course he is already the Baron Lloyd-Webber and enormously rich but I’ll bet he’d take the gig anyway.

Consider the cast of characters…and never has that phrase been more literally true than with this musical.  We begin with the title character, Donald J. Trump himself. An orange haired, red faced, slightly pudgy, six foot three inches tall, septuagenarian, who has just, very improbably, been elected President of the United States.
We open at Trump Tower where the main characters are assembled to get what they are sure is the word of their defeat. The Trump children and Jared Kushner, Ivanka’s husband, are initially teary eyed as they surround their father. A slightly more outer circle composed of the shorter and less important advisors, Steve Bannon, Rudy Giuliani, Kellyanne Conway, Hope Hicks and Chris Christie are seen weeping on each other’s shoulders. They pivot every 15 seconds to change to other shoulders. Their movements should be slightly syncopated.
On stage left and stage right there are two choruses: One of these choruses is African American; the other consists of women in head-scarves and Burqas. The African Americans are variously costumed, some in football uniforms, some in baseball uniforms, some in business suits and some in the caps and gowns of academics. They are jubilant, many are line dancing and high fiving each other. The Muslim women have formed a line and are doing a creditable two-step.
Various other stage bits can be inserted where appropriate.

The second act opens with the word that Trump has won. Now everything changes. Lighting is dimmer and more somber except for the orange–red spots on Trump. Trump has been hoisted in a chair by his inner circle and they are jubilantly carrying him around the stage. They begin to chant, “Two terms, two terms.” His groups form dancing circles and do the hora until an outraged Steve Bannon forces them to revert to a standard American barn dance where he can be the caller.
The choruses have changed too; the African Americans are sobbing, throwing themselves flat on the stage and tearing at their clothes. The women in their Burqas have stopped dancing and have become silent and immobile. (Yes I know how improbable it is to have African Americans and Muslims forming Greek choruses. I said that this is whimsy.)

The final act is one month later. Trump is seated in a chair center stage, otherwise the stage is empty. There is a blue-white spot on Trump. Trump stands up, reaches behind him to a golf bag on a wheeled cart. And begins to exit stage left. He turns toward the audience and says, “It’s not about having it; it’s about winning it. Now that I’ve won it, you can have it.”
CURTAIN
OK, I know it’ll have to open out of town.





Tuesday, November 15, 2016

2016 Nov 15th

The Trump team does not have a deep bench, there are not a lot of distinguished statesmen (or stateswomen) competing for senior positions in this administration. The principals in the contest for Secretary of State are John Bolton and Rudy Giuliani. Let’s face it folks, the barrel’s bottom is being scraped if these are the candidates.
Giuliani has absolutely no experience dealing with international issues. His qualifications to be appointed Secretary of State lie in his ability to fawn over Donald Trump and that he does superbly well. Giuliani is wonderfully effective at patting Trump on the back whenever the opportunity presents itself, that is whenever the cameras are rolling.
John Bolton is another story. Bolton is a true chicken hawk. His solution to the Iran problem is to bomb them so they can’t develop nuclear weapons. Generally speaking, Bolton thinks very highly of war as long as he is not personally participating. He favored invading Iraq years before Iraq was actually invaded and still believes that the invasion was a great idea.
In his remarks on the occasion of Yale’s Law School 25th reunion, he said he saw no reason to go and die in a South Vietnam rice paddy given that the war was already lost. He didn’t object to other people dying in Vietnam, he just didn’t want to do it himself.
George Bush nominated him as our ambassador to the UN but his appointment languished absent senate confirmation. Finally, Bush used a recess appointment to bypass the senate confirmation process. Bolton was not even approved by General Colin Powell, then his superior as Secretary of State. Now Bolton is back for another try.

Most of Trump’s cabinet picks are recently available because they have been rejected by the voters or they have run into term limits. Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona is considering a spot as head of Homeland Security, or whatever is available, if he can just stay out of jail himself as he risks that possibility on contempt of court charges.
Dr. Ben Carson says that he will not accept Secretary of Health and Welfare, or Surgeon General, because he just doesn’t know enough about the workings of these departments and he doesn’t want to embarrass the new President. This modesty about his talents didn’t stop him from running for President.
Sarah Palin is being considered for Secretary of the Interior. What a delight it would be to have her back and available for interviews. SNL must be ecstatic at the possibility.Top of Form

Bottom of Form
Eliot A. Cohen, a former State Department official in the Bush administration claimed that the Trump people deserved some help and he would see what he could do. That changed, he said, after having spoken to Mr. Trump’s team, he had “changed my recommendation: stay away. They’re angry, arrogant, screaming ‘you LOST!’ This will be ugly.”
Impeachment is looking more and more likely.






Monday, November 14, 2016

2016 Nov 14th

Trump has appointed two major advisors to his administration: Heading the list is Steve Bannon whose title in the Trump administration is “Chief Strategist and Senior Counselor.” Reince Priebus, formerly Chairman of the Republican Party, in now Chief of Staff. It is apparent that Steve Bannon is not part of the staff of which Priebus is chief. The two are supposed to be equal partners. What a chuckle that is.

For someone who talks of “bringing the country together,” Bannon as an advisor is a curious choice. Bannon is the hero of the alt-right, a portion of the electorate that used to be called the fascist fringe. His appointment as a major Trump adviser is cheered by David Duke, former grand poo-bah of the KKK. It is interesting that while all the Republican politicians have enthusiastically remarked on the selection of Reince Priebus as White House Chief of Staff, there have been no congratulatory comments about the selection of Steve Bannon.

Bannon’s statements coincide with the views of the KKK to a remarkable degree. He is divorced and his former wife has custody of their children. She had filed domestic abuse charges against him but had, remarkably, refused to testify against him at the trial. Charges were dropped. Some intimidation is suspected.
Bannon had complained about his daughters attending a particular private school, claiming that he didn’t want his children going to school with a bunch of Jews. This bigotry has also surfaced when he commented about Bill Kristol, founder and editor of “The Weekly Standard,” by saying that Kristol was “A Republican spoiler and a renegade Jew.”
This bigotry is perfectly clear but there is more, bigotry is rarely confined to hatred against just one group. Bannon has said that feminists “are a bunch of dykes.” People who  support equal rights are “all about victimhood.”
This guy, who would ordinarily be found under a rock, is now “Chief Strategist and Senior Advisor” to the next president of the United States.


There is more: We have a curious group of Trump advisers, there are Bannon and Priebus, as I’ve mentioned…and then, additionally, we have Jared Kushner. To refresh your memory, Jared Kushner is the Jewish husband of Donald Trump’s daughter, Ivana.  She converted to his faith, so Kushner is seriously Jewish. Kushner has been a powerful force in the Trump campaign. Some believe Kushner is responsible for the diminution of Governor Christie’s influence because Kushner’s father, a real estate tycoon, was prosecuted by Christie for some offence and was sentenced to sometime in the slammer. So make no mistake, Kushner has clout. And now comes Kushner, this seriously Jewish gentleman very close to Donald Trump, to mingle with this seriously bigoted Steve Bannon, all to be refereed by poor Reince Priebus. What fun!

Sunday, November 13, 2016

2016 Nov 13th

It may be that Donald J. Trump’s days of presidential power are numbered; some believe that the number will not make it into triple digits. Wouldn’t that be a hoot? No, this is not just wishful thinking, there are some highly paid prognosticators who are pushing this idea.
One of the top dogs in this kennel is Professor Alan Lichtman of American University. Lichtman is a political historian, who, in spite of many opinions to the contrary, predicted a Trump win. There were many other people who predicted a Trump win, all of the Trumpettes and certainly Trump himself. The difference here is that Lichtman has correctly predicted the presidential election results since 1984.
Lichtman, after having been right on his election call, has gone a step further and predicted that Trump will be impeached.  This, he says, is not the result of his usual pre-election forecast, but just a “gut feeling.” He is not alone in this prediction either, although no Trumpettes are joining him on this one. Such luminaries as Bouncy-bouncy Limbaugh have also suggested this possibility.

Why would the Republicans want to get rid of the guy who helped them avoid a Hilary Clinton presidency? Easy answer: Trump is not a Republican and his agenda just doesn’t fit the Republican world view. True, he is for massive tax cuts and that fits, but then these cuts will lead to massive deficits and an increase in the national debt. Claiming that these deficits will be offsets by economic growth is pie in the sky and the Republicans know it.
Trump is unwilling to cut entitlements; Social Security and Medicare are to remain intact. Republican orthodoxy requires  that Medicare be replaced by a Medical Savings Plan in which citizens can set aside income before tax to pay for medical expenses. How does that help the unemployed? Suppose your medical expenses exceed the amount you can afford to set aside; what then?
Social Security should be privatized so that the money set aside can be invested, with the help of knowledgeable brokers of course. Later the money will be there for the use by the retiree and the procedure will certainly provide a financial bonanza for the brokers.
There are many other differences between Trump’s plans and Republican orthodoxy, building the wall and deporting aliens are just a few.

Why impeach Trump? Then instead of the hopelessly unpredictable Trump you get the doctrinaire Mike Pence, Pence is a known quantity, pliable and very predictable. Everything Donald Trump is not, so why not get rid of Trump and get Pence?
What grounds for impeachment could there be? How about the 75 pending lawsuits against him. His presidency does not protect him from these legal actions. This was decided by SCOTUS when Bill Clinton was sued by Paula Jones, The court allowed the suit but it was settled without Clinton admitting guilt. The point here is that Clinton, as president was not immune from a lawsuit and neither will Trump…and Trump faces 75 of these legal actions; good luck Donny boy!.


Saturday, November 12, 2016

2016 Nov 12th

This is from “A Double Dozen and Six,” a collection of essays/memoirs I piblished to very minor acclaim some years ago. A more up to date political commentary will follow tomorrow.


The Second Marriage


I have been married twice. You probably deduced that from the title of this piece, but I wanted to be sure you knew that I knew what I was talking about.
Second marriages are fraught with danger. Many second marriages end in divorce. If your first marriage ended in divorce, a template for the end of your second marriage is available. This is one reason why second marriages are so parlous. If it didn’t work the first time, you learned it wasn’t the end of the world; if this one doesn’t work, you can deal with it. Your threshold for departure from your new marriage is now much lower than it was for your first marriage. That is a terrible attitude to bring to a marriage. And it may account for the failure of many second marriages.
My wife forced me into this marriage. That’s right, forced me into it. She didn’t use a gun; Oh no, she was much too clever for that, besides, a gun wouldn’t have worked. We had been going together for some time and I saw no reason whatever to change the status quo. I thought the arrangement was splendid. She did not. (It only takes one.) I told her that I was too young when I got married the first time and, now, even though I was sixty-one, I was not going to make the same mistake again. She agreed that I was immature, but she then presented me with some unassailable logic. She wanted to be married. She loved me, so I was the preferred candidate. However, if I turned down the job she would just have to move on to the next candidate.  I knew that there was no next candidate, but I also knew that she would have no trouble whatever pulling candidates by the fistfuls out of the bushes; besides, I was in love with her. I proposed; she accepted. Very smart move on my part.
As we’d each been married before, we saw no need for all the marriage bells and whistles. We each had one elderly parent living at some distance from us. They would feel obliged to attend. We each had two married children from our previous marriages and they, even with their busy schedules, would feel obliged to attend.  My fiancĂ©e had five busy siblings…well, you get the picture. We decided to elope. We told only our parents and our children, no one else. Now, the question was where to do the deed. We thought about Las Vegas. We’d take one set of good clothes for the necessary pictures, and go the Vegas route. I called the Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce toll free number and got the magic voice of Tony Orlando, “This is Tony Orlando for the Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce. If you want to get married, press one; if you want to get divorced, press two; if you want to know what shows are on press three; etc.” Honest, that’s verbatim.
I pressed one and found out that no blood test was needed. Fine, whatever we could have caught from each other we had already caught. We also found out that the license bureau was open twenty-four hours a day, Thursday through Sunday. My bride had brought along a bunch of wedding announcements to mail from Vegas to surprise our friends. (I had been single for thirteen years; she had been single for six months.) There would be a lot of surprised friends. Then we caught a typical Gamblers Package on a Friday morning, and off we went. We did not dwell on the fact that it was called a Gambler’s Package.
Neither of us had ever been to Vegas before. The hotel room was Spartan, not even a TV, surprise, surprise. I guess they expected us to participate in other entertainments. We were early risers. We usually got up at six and were ready for the day by seven. By seven-thirty, our time, we had finished breakfast and had emerged from our hotel to the sweltering heat and empty streets of Las Vegas.  It was five-thirty in Las Vegas. No matter, the license bureau was open according to Tony Orlando.  We hopped on a bus and got off ten minutes later at the bureau, only it wasn’t the license bureau; it was the wedding commissioner’s office. He told us to go across the street to the license bureau, get our license, and then come back and he could marry us…just like that. That’s scary. The license bureau was deserted except for five typists and us. They told us that it was early and that by noon there would be a line around the block. We filled out the forms and got our license. Now we had a choice. We were in blue jeans. Did we go all the way back to the hotel, change into something more formal, find a “wedding chapel,” pay much money, get married, yada, yada, yada, or did we simply go across the street and let the nice man there marry us for a mere thirty-five bucks. Guess what we did?
The commissioner was great. The little ceremony was great. Nothing was rushed, tawdry, or the least glitzy. I kissed the bride and then we went out to the waiting area while the commissioner made copies of the documents for us to take home.
While we waited, we saw the next couple, a stunning nineteen-year-old girl and a sixty-something weather-beaten old farmer, both dressed to the nines. We looked at each other, then at them and my new wife told them we hoped they’d be as happy as we expected to be. The bride blushed and the farmer laughed, “Hell honey, I ain’t the groom. Here’s the groom.”
And a handsome young six-footer stepped out of the men’s room to join his father and his bride. First lesson in our married life, “Don’t jump to conclusions.”
That was almost twenty years ago. Weddings don’t have to be fancy to be memorable.

Tomorrow Trump!!



Friday, November 11, 2016

2016 Nov 11th

Cal Thomas. formerly a vice  president of the Moral Majority, has never given up hope of turning America into a Christian  theocracy. Now he seems to believe that Trump’s victory will help his cause. Trump’s instructions to his fans about protesters, “Smash them in the face,” a not entirely Christian position, his suggestion that he needs no forgiveness because if he makes a mistake he corrects it himself, is all forgotten by Thomas now that Trump has won the Presidency.
Cal Thomas’ opening sentence in his column today leads one to believe that his grip on reality is as tenuous as Donald Trump’s. He writes, “Donald Trump’s impressive victory in Tuesday’s election offers him a rare opportunity to change the narrative.” Really Cal? This “impressive victory” found the majority of Americans voting against Donald J. Trump and the vast majority of Americans, when asked, asserted that they believed him unfit to be president…but some of them voted for him anyway. Trump lost the popular election by very nearly 400 thousand votes. Clinton was successfully demonized and that, presumably, offset the clear evidence the Trump was Putin’s puppet. Go figure!

Thomas tells us that, “…Trump also had coattails allowing Republicans to maintain control of both houses of congress.” That’s true but those were very short coattails because the Republican majorities in both houses of congress are now less, not more, than they were before the election.
A Democrat defeated the governor of North Carolina, famous for insisting that users of rest rooms select the facility appropriate for their birth certificate listed gender. I guess there will be no cops outside rest rooms checking users’ birth certificates in North Carolina.

Thomas claims that in 2008 Democrats, “…rammed through legislation that reflected their worldview.” Therefore, Republicans should now do the same. To put it in politically correct terms, that is false to fact. The Republican congressional minority, which did not last for the length of the President’s term in office, used every parliamentary trick they could find to obstruct and delay every progressive measure the President attempted. Guess what the Democrats will do now.

Moving on from Cal Thomas, we find that Trump has appointed his children to manage his businesses, which he says will be in a blind trust. We know that his children will not say one word to him about these business interests for the next four years.
The Trump transition team has transitioned from the leadership of Governor Christie to Governor Pence. Something will be found for Christie to do, whether or not he’ll agree to do it is another matter.
Then there are dueling opinions about a Chief of Staff; this is the premier consiglieri and presidential trouble-shooter. This is a “biggy” because it appears to be between Reince Prebus and Steve Bannon. Priebus represents a move toward a normalized relationship with people with whom Trump will have to work. Priebus knows all of the Republican bigwigs and little wigs. He is the choice of Trump’s inner circle.

Bannon is entirely different; he is said to be Trump’s preferred candidate and he is cozy with the alt-right. With Bannon’s selection we might wind up with David Duke as Secretary of State.