Dec 27th
The big news today is that Trey Gowdy has endorsed Marco
Rubio for President. While you might have heard of Marco Rubio, the
semi-controversial Senator who is a Republican candidate for the Presidency,
Congressman Gowdy is less famous. So let’s begin with an explanation of Rubio’s
being semi-controversial. You would suppose that a Cuban-American whose father
fled Cuba would have considerable appeal to the Latin American community.
Indeed he would and this appeal would be enhanced by his inclusion in the “gang
of eight,” a bi-partisan group of Senators (four Republicans and four
Democrats) who planned to offer a road to legitimacy to undocumented immigrants.
As you might expect the very idea of any bi-partisan group working on anything
was anathema to the far right of the Republican Party and when bi-partisan is
coupled with immigration reform, particularly a path to citizenship, the far
right near fainted dead away at awfulness of it. So Marco Rubio, who was a
member of this group, as was former Republican standard bearer John McCain, had
to cleanse himself by claiming that he no longer agreed with the group.
As you might imagine all was by no means forgiven and Rubio
has been dealing with the shame of his association with the “gang of eight”
ever since. Now comes the stern faced Trey Gowdy who chaired the Congressional Committee
charged with browbeating Hillary Clinton into guilty submission on the Benghazi
issue. It didn’t quite work out that way. After grilling Clinton for eleven
hours Gowdy had discovered nothing he didn’t already know. Clinton however had
shown great stamina and considerable restraint coupled with some amusement at
Gowdy’s antics. Her performance at this inquisition certainly gutted Trump’s
suggestion that she hadn’t the stamina to be president. Can anyone imagine
Trump surviving such a grilling? The upshot was that instead of diminishing
Clinton’s appeal Gowdy gave her an eleven-hour advertisement. Rubio now has
Gowdy’s endorsement but why would he want it?
And now we have George Will providing some interesting
commentary about Donald Trump. Will is very unhappy about the Trump phenomena
and Trump is almost equally unhappy about George Will. George Will even goes so far as to claim that
denying Trump the Republican nomination is more important than beating Hillary
Clinton in November. Will claims that Trump as the Republican nominee will
destroy the Republican Party. Of course denying Trump the nomination would
almost certainly mean that Trump would run as an independent which would assure
Hillary Clinton’s election victory. As far as Will is concerned that outcome is
preferable to having Trump as his party’s nominee.
According to Will, Trump is a “fundamentally sad figure who
has every disagreeable human trait.” He compares Trump’s comments about Russia’s
Putin to “a puppy’s insatiable need to be petted.” But then Trump claims that
Will should be banned from Fox news because he is “boring and biased.” But
biased is surely no reason to be banned from Fox News.
No comments:
Post a Comment