Aug 2nd
George Will has taken up the cudgel lately swung against
Planned Parenthood (PP) by Cal Thomas. This must be a contest among right wing
columnists to see which one can be most hyperbolic in their criticism of PP.
George gets a spectacular start on his hyperbolic journey by
titling his piece “The barbarity of a nation, Planned Parenthood.” “The barbarity
of a nation” Wow! That’ll get your attention. Note that the “Barbarity of a
nation” is not the killing of about 500 thousand Iraqis from 2003 to 2011 on
the false premise that they were a threat to this country because they had, or
were developing, weapons of mass destruction. Or the mass killing of our own
citizens, 150 thousand over the last five years, by gunfire. Yes sir, Planned
Parenthood is far more barbaric than any of that.
I know that George Will is a busy guy; what with public
appearances and columns to do and all, but given what he’s paid one does expect
originality. On July 26th Cal
Thomas, writing on the very same topic and excoriating PP to a fare-the-well
wrote, “…if we are of no greater moral value than a hamburger…” Then George
Will, on August 2nd speaking of PP’s attitude toward a fetus, “Never
does it have a moral standing superior to a tumor or a hamburger in its
mother’s stomach.” This is surely an accidental borrowing of an image; but
that’s points off for George and he was doing so well. Oh and George, the fetus
is not in its mother’s stomach; it’s in the mother’s uterus, or womb if you
like, but please not her stomach; impressionable children may be reading this.
George Will tells us that life begins when a sperm
fertilizes an egg. Actually, life begins before that; egg cells are alive and
so are sperm cells. George wants us to accept a fertilized egg cell travelling
down a fallopian tube is a human being. This is rather like insisting that
acorns are oak trees.
George has a field day with his adjectives: Consider his
observation that SCOTUS “discovered constitutional significance in the number
nine.” Well no George, the significance was that prior to the second trimester
the fetus cannot survive as a separate being. George finds this a “preposterous
assertion.” Then he claims the court follows this with “faux humility” then
swerves back to “breathtaking vanity.”
Finally George gets to his trump card “partial birth
abortion” (A term which has no medical significance.) where he can talk of
“tiny limbs and hands.” Now he can
provide colorful descriptions of the procedures required to reduce the size of
a hydrocephalic infant’s head so that it can move through the birth canal
without killing the mother. Of course the mother is never mentioned; it’s only
the “pre-born” that concerns George, the post-born of whatever age is
irrelevant.
No comments:
Post a Comment