2016 Sept 23rd
On Sept 23rd I mislabeled that day’s blog “Sept
24th” so now on Sept 24th I’ll do a blog labeled Sept 23rd.
I hope that’s perfectly clear to everyone. I have no excuse for the mistake;
Sept 23rd is my 89.5 birthday but I doubt that is to blame; it’s
more likely the associated cortical shrinkage.
The debate on Monday the 26th dominates the
political discussion today…at least once we leave the Tulsa/ Charlotte assassinations
behind. (It is very dangerous for black men, or women, to be driving their own
cars south of the Mason-Dixon Line, but then I’m not sure walking is safer.
Treyvon Martin was killed while walking in the wrong neighborhood by a self-styled
community guardian.)
CNN has scheduled a discussion of the debate to begin at 6 o’clock
Monday evening. That’s three hours before the 90 minute long debate. What will
they talk about to fill that three hour time slot? The TV moguls must be sure
that there will be lots of “eyeballs” eager for three hours of commentary
before the real thing begins. I’ve heard they expect close to 100 million
debate watchers. That many viewers could command quite an ad premium and the
money is what this is all about as far as the TV networks are concerned, so the
earlier they start coverage the more money they make.
Trump has made three to four TV appearances every week for
many months. The networks have been there to cover these events because Trump
is sufficiently unpredictable that something newsworthy might happen; it
usually does. This TV coverage of Trump’s events costs the Trump campaign
nothing and on each occasion Trump vilifies Hillary Clinton; he refers to her
as “Crooked” Hillary. He lies about her record and these lies are repeated
every time Trump faces any sort of gathering. He also pushes the notion that
the country is on the verge of collapse and that only he can save it. Both of
these are lies as well.
We have known for a long time that if you hear something
repeated often enough you will come to believe it. The result is that Trump’s repeated comments
about “Crooked” Hilary have had the effect of lowering the public’s perception
of Clinton’s trustworthiness. This has been helped, obviously, by Clinton’s own
clumsiness with her private server email problems. Fox News is also willing to
hammer away at the Crooked Hillary handle. Fortunately, many voters don’t care
overmuch about Clinton’s emails. The undecided voters are those who haven’t
been influenced by the emails or by Benghazi and Trump is unlikely to appeal to
them.
No comments:
Post a Comment