2016 Dec 12th
This morning General Michael Hayden, former director of the
CIA, was interviewed on “Morning Joe.” This is one impressive guy; the only
comparison I’ve heard interviewed by them is when they bring on Mika Brzezinski’s
father, Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski. (Mika is vaultingly sincere but she provides an
excellent example of intellectual regression to the mean. Of course she has a
considerable distance to drop before she gets to average.)
Now, lest we bury the lead, General Hayden clarified the
problem in the apparent contradiction between the FBI declaring that there was
no evidence that Russian hacking had interfered in our election and the CIA
concluding that Russia had done exactly that. The fact that Trump has belittled
the CIA’s conclusion is no surprise and has nothing to do with his
manufacturing of their past “failure” with the weapons of mass destruction
gambit. Actually it is quite the opposite.
You may recall that
Ambassador Joe Wilson was sent on a mission to determine if yellow cake, a
barely refined source of Uranium, had been shipped to Iraq from Niger in
Africa. Yellow cake could be further refined and used to make nuclear weapons. This
mission was financed by the CIA and was with the knowledge of Niger’s ambassador.
George Bush had pushed the notion that some aluminum tubes ordered by Iraq were
for use in centrifuges so it was important to find Iraq importing yellow cake…only
Ambassador Wilson found they were not doing that at all.
This finding infuriated the war party led by Cheney and so
in revenge they outed Valerie Plame, Joe Wlson’s wife, who worked as a
clandestine CIA operative; the journalist Robert Novak leaked this information,
destroying Plame’s career.
The upshot is that evidence of Russian activity in our
election gleaned from foreign sources is not available to the FBI whose
activities are, by law, only within the borders of this country. When DNC and
RNC materials hacked by Russia appear in foreign sourced articles only the CIA
will know about it. Instead of bring these agencies closer to cooperating with
each other, an outcome surely in the national interest, Trump has further
driven a wedge between them and this seems entirely because any hint that
Russia might have influenced his win, in his mind, detracts from his
importance. As we all know anything detracting from Donald Trump’s importance
cannot be tolerated by Donald Trump.
He may also have some problems if he picks Tillerson as his
Secretary of State. Two Putin puppets may be more that the Senate can handle.
Senator Rubio has expressed doubts and others may come forward as well. Then
there is the fact that Tillerson spoke strongly against sanctioning Russia over
their invasion of Crimea and Ukraine. The question will arise: “Whose side is
he on?”
No comments:
Post a Comment